Intro, 3rd par: UBVRI is either not spaced consistently or latex just made it look that way.

Sect 3.1, last par: I presume that the galaxies other than NGC 3034 were corrected in the 5.8 and 8.0 micron frames, though that isn't necessarily clear.  I don't know whether that is worth clarifying or not.

Sect 4.3: I believe there should be an 'and' between '0.9,' and '1.7 MJy'?

Sect 5.3, 1st par, 1st sent after eq 4: It seemed to me that 'were' performed would be more consistent than 'are' performed?

Sect 5.5, 4th par: Comma after "In the top panel of Figure 13"?

Summary, 2nd par: acknowledge NED? (see Table 1 notes comment)

Table 1: I realize the LVL galaxy names have histories and lives of their own (eg, NGC numbers used in some cases, but not others), but here are a few things I noticed above and beyond galaxy name preferences...
   -- Galaxy names in text and captions have spaces between the identifier and the number, whereas they do not in the table.
   -- Unlike the other UGC ##### galaxies, UGC5428 and UGC5442 only have 4 digits in their number (going back further than this paper).
   -- NGC 4594 is listed as M 104 in Kennicutt et al. 2008, whereas I think all the other overlapping galaxies use the same name.
   -- MRK475 should be MRK 0475 if we're not dropping leading zeroes.
   
--Lack of spaces: I was either avoiding extra Latex/Table hassle, or trying to save space.  I'll think about re-doing to be consistent (if it's easy!).  I can/should easily add the leading zeroes, like I did for the text.  At some point in our UWyo data processing and analysis frenzy last year, I 'froze' the name convention and required all my guys to use the same exact names for ease of cross-person manipulations.  I must have changed m104 to n4594 for uniformity, and i'd like to stick with that decision.
  
Table 1, notes: Technically, not all of the magnitudes, redshifts, distances, and optical morphologies are from Kennicutt et al. (2008), because (unless I'm mistaken) these galaxies weren't in the Halpha paper...

ESO 410-G005
Sculptor-dE1
ESO 294-G010
ESO 540-G030
ESO 540-G032
UGC 00521
NGC 0404
IC 2049
UGCA 133
F8D1
[FM2000] 1
LEDA 166101
Arp's Loop
KKH 057
AM 1001-270
BK 05N
IKN
[HS98] 117
DDO 078
BK 06N
UGC 06782
ESO 321-G014
UGC 07321
KKH 086
KKR 25
KKH 098

--All of these except for U521, IC2049, U6782, and U7321 are from ANGST, and in the text I refer the reader to both Kennicutt et al. 2008 *and* Dalcanton 2009 (for ANGST).

Fig 7, caption: "solid and dotted lines" instead of "line"?