The UV/IR paper is a nice comprehensive piece of work.
I haven't really made any contribution, though, so you can
leave me out of the et al. in the author list.

I do have a comment. By lumping 10% calibration
errors in with the IRAC measurements, I fear that you
make them much less useful for many applications.
First, any calibration error is likely to propagate
from one band to the other, so it is not correct that
there can be independent 10% errors - that is,
it is not likely that the net uncertainty in an IRAC
color difference measured to high nominal SNR could
have a calibration uncertainty of 14% rms. Also, they
claim a calibration accuracy of about 3%, I believe.
Of course, there is the nasty problem of extended emission and
scattered light at 5.8 and 8 microns, but in the two shorter
bands smaller errors are appropriate, and it would
be more useful if the reader could easily separate the
calibration component from the statistical one.

--After consultation with Tom Jarrett, the text has been 
  revised to indicate that the IRAC flux calibration is
  5-10% at 3.6 and 4.5 and 10-15% at 5.8 and 8.0.