1
|
- Question 1 (1 point) Which of the below sequences shows
objects with increasing densities?
- a.Earth -- Sun -- White Dwarf -- Black Hole -- Neutron Star
- b.Red Giant -- White Dwarf -- Neutron Star -- Black Hole
- c.Earth -- Neutron Star -- White Dwarf -- Black Hole
- d.Sun -- White Dwarf -- Earth -- Black Hole -- Neutron Star
- e.White Dwarf -- Red Giant -- Sun -- Earth -- Neutron Star
- This should be something you know from the book and lectures. Density, recall, is a mass divided by
a volume. If you know the masses
and the sizes of these objects, even roughly, it should let you easily
put them in density order.
|
2
|
- Question 2 (1 point) We believe that we receive hundreds of
pulses per second from so-called "millisecond pulsars" because
the neutron star emitting them:
- a.Is spinning hundreds of times per second.
- b.Is actually pulsing (due to thermal instabilities) and changing its
size hundreds of times per second.
- c.Is in a binary system orbiting another star hundreds of times per
second.
- d.Is seen through a certain kind of nebula that causes
"scintillation".
- e.Is surrounded by an accretion disk which has material orbiting the
star hundreds of times per second.
- According to the “lighthouse” model of pulsars, we’re seeing the neutron
star’s magnetic north (or south) pole once per spin, and the rotation
axis and the magnetic axis are offset.
|
3
|
- Question 3 (1 point) Assume that relatively young white
dwarfs and neutron stars have similar temperatures (both very hot,
although cooling at different rates). White dwarfs are hard to spot
because the radiating surface is small (about the size of Earth).
Neutron stars are even smaller (for this questions assume 10 km radius).
How much fainter are they?
- a.About 4 million times fainter.
- b.About 400000 times fainter.
- c.About 40000 times fainter.
- d.About 4000 times fainter.
- e.about 400 times fainter.
- We know that the luminosity of a star depends on its temperature to the
4th power times a constant times its surface area. If temperature is the same, this
question really boils down to the relative surface areas. Ballpark, a neutron star has a radius
= 10km, while a white dwarf is about the size of the Earth (radius =
6378 km). Surface area depends on
the radius squared. Squaring
6378/10 gives about 400,000.
|
4
|
- Question 4 (1 point) The black hole in the center of our Milky Way
galaxy seems to be about 2.6 million times the mass of the sun according
to the text. (Recently updated to
3.6 million solar masses, so use the new value here.) What is the radius of its event
horizon? Think about how big this is compared to other astronomical
objects (e.g., Earth, the sun, the solar system, the distances between
stars).
- a.About a billion km.
- b.About 5.5 thousand km.
- c.About 5.5 million km.
- d.About 11 thousand km.
- e.About 11 million km.
- Use the equation for the even horizon radius, R = 2GM/C2 and
plug in the right numbers. Or
remember that the horizon for a solar mass black hole is 3 km, and
multiply by 3.6 million.
|
5
|
- Question 5 (1 point) The use of Cepheid variable stars to
find distances relies on the fact that
a. their luminosities are
related to their ages. b. their luminosities are all the same.
c. their radial velocities are related to their periods. d.
their luminosities are related to their periods.
- Question 6 (1 point)
You observe two Cepheid variable stars, A and B, which have the same
average apparent magnitude. Star A brightens and dims with a period of 5
days, while star B has a period of 18 days. Which star is closer to
Earth?
a.Star A b.Star B
c.Star A and B are at the same distance d.You cannot tell
from this information
- Make the following argument to solve this one easily. The period-luminosity relationship is
precise, but precision is not needed here. The star with the longer period will
be more luminous, so that is star B.
But we want to know the distance.
They both appear to have the same average apparent
magnitude. If one is more
luminous than the other, the more luminous one must be farther way – if
it wasn’t, it would appear brighter.
Therefore the less luminous star is closer, and that is star A.
|
6
|
- Question 7 (1 point)
Which of the following is not a characteristic of the stars of the disk
component of our galaxy?
a. circular orbits b.
random highly inclined orbits c.higher metal abundance d.
young stars e. star formation regions
-
Question 8 (1 point) If the sun is 5 billion years
old, how many times has it orbited the galaxy? Assume a circular orbit
for the sun around the center of the galaxy, and look up in the text its
orbital speed and distance from the galactic center.
a. 5 times b. 5 billion
times c. 200 times d. 20 times e. 5000 times
- Approach this problem like a time, rate, distance problem to figure out
an orbital period, then see how many go into 5 billion years. If the orbital speed is 220 km/s, and
the oribital radius is 8.5 kpc, we can get the period (time): time =
speed/distance and we must convert.
8.5 kpc = 8500 pc x 3.1 x 10 13 meters/pc = 2.6x1017
km. So time = 2πx2.6x1017
km/220 km/s = 7.5x1015 s.
What is that in years?
There are about 31 million seconds per year, so this period is
7.5x1015/3.1x107 = 2.4x108 years, or
about 240 million years. 5
billion divided by 240 million is 5x109/2.4x108 = 20.8.
|
7
|
- Question 9 (1 point) If all
the mass in our galaxy were centrally concentrated, we'd expect
velocities to fall with increasing distance according to Kepler's laws.
This is not seen in the disks of spiral galaxies. Galactic rotation
curves appear "flat" with increasing distance. This must be
due to
a. The gravitational
influence of massive globular clusters in the halo. b. The
difficulty in measuring velocities of stars in the galactic disk because
of all the gas and dust. c. The fact that Kepler's laws do not
apply over the 25 kpc size of the Milky Way galaxy because the effect of
gravity travels only at the speed of light. d. The Spiral density
wave traveling at a different speed than the stars in the disk. e.
The gravitaional influence of "dark matter" in the halo.
- Question 10 (1 point) The location of the sun relative to the
center of our galaxy was FIRST CORRECTLY determined by
a. the relative brightness
of the visible Milky Way in different directions. b. the positions of the globular clusters
and the properties of the variable stars in them. c. the position
of supernova. d. radio maps of the galaxy.
- Question 11 (1 pt) If you find a metal-rich star it is more likely to be
a member of which Population? A.
Population I (the disk)
|
8
|
- Question 12: If interstellar dust makes an RR Lyrae star look 1
magnitude fainter than it should, by how much will we overestimate its
distance?
- We know how to get distances based on the distance modulus equation:
- d(pc) = 10 (m-M+5)/5
- So the apparent magnitude “m” increases by 1 compared to the no dust
case. Our distance overestimate
can be expressed:
- d(dust)/d(no dust) = 10(md-M+5)/5/10(mn-M+5)/5
= 10 (md-mn)/5
- This is just 100.2 which is 1.6 (answer a).
- Another way you might do it and might seem easier is just to pick some
numbers for M and m and do it with m changing by 1. The distance ratio will be the same
for any choices.
|
9
|
- Question 13 (1 point) One fundamental requirement for an
object to be a good tracer (i.e. marker) of the galaxy's spiral arms is
that it be
a.moving with small radial
velocity (relative to earth). b.moving with large radial velocity
(relative to earth). c. a short lived and therefore young object.
d. a very long lived and therefore probably old object.
- Question 14 (2 points, extra credit).
The answer is tidal forces which you can get easily if you read
the story “Neutron Star.”
|