Astr 5460 Fri., Jan. 24, 2003
|
|
|
Today: Cinnamon Internet/Projection Test |
|
Ordering Textbook |
|
Course Webpage |
|
Astro-ph (xxx.lanl.gov) |
|
Longair, Chapter 1 (History) |
|
Assignment for next Friday |
|
|
|
Note:
This class will meet W&F, 5440 will be M&W |
“Astro-ph”
|
|
|
The Los Alamos Preprint Server for
physics and astronomy at http://xxx.lanl.gov |
|
Standing assignment: review the
abstracts daily |
|
Probably once a week (Fridays) we’ll
discuss the exgal papers that seem the most interesting |
|
Not a big deal here – just trying to
establish good habits |
|
|
Course Webpage
|
|
|
|
Start from my webpage: |
|
http://physics.uwyo.edu/~mbrother |
|
Hit the ASTR 5460 Link |
|
Not much there now, but that will be
the clearinghouse for course information, including lecture slides, links to
articles, assignments, etc. |
|
|
Prehistory
|
|
|
|
Edwin Hubble |
|
Distances to the “Spiral Nebula” using
Cepheids: |
|
|
Prehistory
|
|
|
|
Edwin Hubble |
|
Distances to the “Spiral Nebula” using
Cepheids |
|
Hubble Law: |
|
|
The Hubble Law using
galaxies with visible Cepheid variables.
The Hubble Law and the
Age of the Universe
Ho = 72 ±8
km/s/Mpc
Assignment for next
Friday
|
|
|
|
Recreate Hubble’s 1929 plot using the
same galaxies he used, but use modern values. |
|
You will probably need to use NED (NASA
Extragalactic Database) and/or NASA’s ADS abstract service to find these
values. |
|
Make a nice plot using the plotting
package of your choice (e.g., IDL, sm, igi, by hand). |
|
Get the slope (method of your choice,
some are better than others) which is the Hubble constant. |
|
Compare your value to Hubble’s and to
the modern value. What’s going on? |
|
You might want to learn to use LaTeX,
too. |
|
|
Theory of Expanding
Universe
|
|
|
Einstein (1915) and General Relativity,
in 1917 uses the cosmological constant to get a static universe solution
(“Greatest blunder of my career.”) |
|
|
|
de Sitter, Friedman, and Lemaitre
follow, with more solutions covering a variety of situations, including no
matter, closed universes, and expanding universes (and this is all before
Hubble found and expanding universe) |
|
|
|
Cosmological constant was handy,
however, for reconciling Hubble’s universe age with the age of Earth, and
handy today in reconciling otherwise conflicting data. |
|
|
The Big Bang
|
|
|
George Gamow (late 1940s) realized that
running the expansion backwards means a hot, dense early universe that was
radiation dominated, and nucleosynthesis was possible. |
|
|
|
With Alpher and Herman predicted
background radiation left over from this period, which would now have a
temperature of about 5 K. |
|
|
|
Penzias and Wilson discover the
background radiation in 1965 by accident, win Nobel prize. |
|
|
Prediction from Big Bang
Model:
Abundance of the light elements
|
|
|
|
|
Big Bang Nucleosynthesis |
|
T, r both high enough at start to fuse protons into
heavier elements |
|
T, r both
dropping quickly so only have time enough to fuse a certain amount. |
|
|
|
Simple models of expansion predict 24%
abundance He |
|
24% is the amount of He observed* |
|
Abundance of 2H, 3He,
7Li depends on rnormal matter |
|
Suggests rnormal matter is only 5% of rcritical |
|
But we need to also consider “dark
matter” and its gravity |
Prediction from Big Bang
model:
Cosmic Background Radiation
|
|
|
Look out (and back in time) to
place where H became neutral |
|
Beyond that the high density ionized H
forms an opaque “wall” |
|
Originally ~3000 K blackbody radiation |
|
The material that emitted it was moving
away from us at extreme speed |
|
That v produces extreme redshift
(z=1000), so photons all appear much redder, so T appears cooler |
|
With red shift, get 2.7 K Planck
blackbody |
|
Should be same in all directions |
Cosmic Microwave
Background Observations
|
|
|
|
|
First detected by Wilson and Penzias in
1960’s |
|
Serendipitous detection – thought is
was noise in their radio telescope but couldn’t find cause. Only later heard of theoretical predictions |
|
|
|
Best spectrum observed by COBE
satellite |
|
Red curve is theoretical prediction |
|
43 Observed data points plotted
there
error bars so small they are covered by curve. |
|
it is covered by curve. |
|
|
|
Isotropy also measured by COBE |
|
T varies by less than 0.01 K across sky |
|
Small “dipole” anisotropy seen |
|
Blue = 2.721 Red = 2.729 |
|
Caused by motion of Milky Way falling
towards the Virgo supercluster. |
Critical points with time
running forward
|
|
|
10-45 sec Quantum
gravity? Physics not understood |
|
10-34 sec 1026
K Nuclear strong force/electro weak force separate
(inflation, matter/antimatter asymmetry) |
|
10-7 sec 1014 K Protons, AntiprotonsÛphotons |
|
10-4 sec 1012 K Number of protons frozen |
|
4 sec 1010 K Number of electrons frozen |
|
2 min Deuterium nuclei
begins to survive |
|
3 min 109 K Helium nuclei begin to survive |
|
30 min 108 K T, r too low for
more nuclear reactions
(frozen number of D, He -- critical
prediction) |
|
300,000 yr 104 K Neutral H atoms begin to survive
(frozen number of photons – critical prediction) |
|
1 billion yr Galaxies begin to form |
|
13 billion yr Present time |
Big Bang Essentials
|
|
|
Hubble Expansion |
|
|
|
Black Body Background Radiation |
|
|
|
Light Element Abundances |
|
|
|
Age of oldest stars consistent with Ho
age |
|
|
Galaxy Formation
|
|
|
Lots of theory here! |
|
|
|
Jeans (1902), gravitational collapse in
a stationary medium, depends on sound speed and density |
|
|
|
Lifshitz (1946), general case including
expanding medium, but collapse is not typically exponetial and structures
grow very slowly – too slowly! Cannot start with infinitesimal perturbations. |
|
|
|
Zeldovich, Novikov, Peebles (1960s)
used finite perturbations (1 part in 10000). |
|
|
|
Main test of all this is the cosmic
microwave background radiation, since fluctations should leave imprints. |
|
|
Galaxy Formation
|
|
|
Thermal history of pregalactic gas can
be worked out in detail (and we will do so!). |
|
|
|
Density fluctuations tied to
temperature fluctuations, revealed finally by COBE, but small. Lots more details to go into here later in
course. |
|
|
|
Two main ideas: top-down vs. bottom-up. |
|
|
|
Need for dark matter (hot or cold)
became apparent – normal matter needs help to collapse into galaxies. |
Very Early Universe
|
|
|
Isotropy – the universe looks the same
in all directions, again strictly true on large scales |
|
|
|
Small Baryon/Anti-baryon asymmetry |
|
|
|
Close to critical (Omega = 1) (will be
HW) |
|
|
|
Initial fluctuations to seed structure
growth |
Very Early Universe
|
|
|
Inflation (Guth, others, early 1980s)
resolves some of these properties.
Inflation posits an early exponential expansion of the universe that
leaves the curvature flat (close to omega = 1) and takes regions in causal
contact and moves them far beyond their local horizons (isotropy). May help form the fluctuations leading to
galaxies. |