Summary of May 2003 KPNO 4-m spectroscopy SHEEP run:

Summary is based on Sifis's summary.  I tried nearly every target on the
list, although quite a few turned out too faint to do in any reasonable
exposure time on the 4-meter.   A few I got lucky with and identified 
[O III] doublets.  Now, there was a bad bias problem that has 
introduced some continuum wiggles in the faint targets also.

first coloumn: 		the chandra source name

second+third coloumns: 	the CHANDRA ra and deg, as sent to us by Paul a
			few days ago. (I saw that they are as good as the
			optical coordinates so I use those numbers)

fourth coloumn: 	R band magnitude

fifth column: 		various comments.

sixth column: 		z and classification, if any

NAME			RA 	DEC	Rmag	COMMENTS; 		z and class
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

'AX J1115.4+5308'    	-	-	-	NO OPT. COUNTERPART	-

'AX J1218.6+0546'   	184.65  5.77457 18.9    A			z=0.80, QSO
		        184.68  5.76277 18.4 	B; extended		z=?, galaxy no lines

'AX J1230.8+1433'    	187.719 14.5514 16.7    bright galaxy		z=0.12, Sey 1

'AX J1231.5+1422'       187.85  14.3567	17.0	bright, far away	z=?, Likely Bl Lac
						from asca source.

'AX J1243.8+1305'    	-	-	-	NO OPT. COUNTERPART

'AX J1354.0+3346'    	208.492 33.7751	20.2	**see below** 		z=?, too faint

'AX J1406.2+2228'    	211.526 22.4826	20.5	**see below**		z=?, too faint

'AX J1406.1+2233'                               **see below**          	z=0.17, NL galaxy 

'AX J1425.2+2303'    	216.321 23.0399 21.8	**see below**		z=?, too faint

'AX J1500.1+3325'    	225.016 33.4284 19.4	mag not very accurate,  z=0.42 ([O III]), ?
						due to the nearby star.

'AX J1511.7+5702'    	227.955 57.0742 21.8	in the skinakas image  	z=?, too faint
						called: AXJ2-Rw.fits

'AX J1511.7+0758'    	227.958 7.98854 15.3	bright galaxy		z=0.055, NL galaxy

'AX J1512.0+5708'    	228.041 57.1306 19.5	in the skinakas image 	z=0.37([O III]), ?
						called: AXJ2-Rw.fits

'AX J1531.8+2414'    	232.968 24.2416 16.9	a galaxy, BUT, ~ 10''   z=0.10, Sey 1
						away from chandra
						position. Source is
						in the skinakas image
						called "AXJ3-Rw.fits". 
						Astrometry may not be 
						accurate at this part of 
						the image, it may be the 
						actual counterpart.

'AX J1531.9+2420'    	232.996 24.3464 17.2	in the image 		z=0.63, QSO
						"AXJ3-Rw.fits" 

'AX J1532.3+2401'    	233.089 24.0079 19.3	A			z=0.57, QSO		
			233.106 24.0184 19.3	B			z=0.58, QSO

'AX J1532.5+2415'    	233.138 24.2573 19.6	this source is also  	---
                                                in "AXJ3-Rw.fits"

'AX J1545.2+4855'    	236.28 	48.9089 -	all source found in 	---
			236.29 	48.9431 -	chandra full band. Only 1 
			236.295 48.9314 -	seems to have a counterpart.
			236.311 48.898  22.3     
			236.34 	48.9403 -
			236.342 48.9246 ?	maybe this one as well, 
						but flux uncertain.

'AX J1617.0+3506'    	244.269 35.0774 -	NO OPTICAL COUNTERPART	---

'AX J1618.1+3459'      	244.548 34.9663 -	Counterpart is OUTSIDE	z=1.7, QSO 
						the field of skinakas 
						image (last 2 targets 
						are in the image called 
						"AXJ2n-Rw.fits".  It is
						clear in the DSS2 image
						Andy sent.

The astrometry of the fields with comment "see below" is not precise.
The situation with the optical counterpart in the field AXJ1406.2+2228 
is VERY tricky. You will see that the optical image is assymetric. I 
believe that the optical counterpart is a faint source immediatedly below 
of the bright source that you will see (it is on the lower left part of 
the bright source). The magnitude I send you corresponds to both sources 
as I cannot easily subtract the bright source (even PSF didn't work well, 
but I will try again). I suspect that your slit will cover both sources 
anyway, but it will be difficult to disentangle the two spectra.

AXJ1406.1+2233 was indeed added by Monday and observed Monday night.